LGBT-related laws by country or territory (Pacifica): Difference between revisions

From TSP Encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Tag: 2017 source edit
No edit summary
Tag: 2017 source edit
Line 71: Line 71:
<br>{{flag|Sedunn}}: While Sedunn was generally tolerant of same-sex sexual activity and while there have been any specific laws governing who could be married, same-sex marriage and families were considered taboo well into the mid-1900s. Regarding laws concerning gender identity, the state does not keep specific records of it other than an entry in the medical journal at birth which cannot be edited.
<br>{{flag|Sedunn}}: While Sedunn was generally tolerant of same-sex sexual activity and while there have been any specific laws governing who could be married, same-sex marriage and families were considered taboo well into the mid-1900s. Regarding laws concerning gender identity, the state does not keep specific records of it other than an entry in the medical journal at birth which cannot be edited.
<br>{{flag|UPRAN}}: Although a portion of judges recognize the pretext of homophobia in many cases of aggression or injustice, there isn't an actual law for these cases, and there can be judges that do not recognize the pretext of homophobia.
<br>{{flag|UPRAN}}: Although a portion of judges recognize the pretext of homophobia in many cases of aggression or injustice, there isn't an actual law for these cases, and there can be judges that do not recognize the pretext of homophobia.
{{Pacifica box}}
[[Category:Collaboration stubs (Pacifica)]]

Revision as of 19:56, 16 September 2023

Rights affecting lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) people vary greatly by country or jurisdiction—encompassing everything from the legal recognition of same-sex marriage to the death penalty for homosexuality.

LGBT rights in: Same-sex sexual activity Recognition of same-sex unions Same-sex marriage Adoption by same-sex couples LGB people allowed to serve openly in military Anti-discrimination laws concerning sexual orientation Laws concerning gender identity/expression
Emerald-Denver (Pacifica) Emerald-Denver Yes Never illegal Yes1756 Union Act, 1901 Federal Act, 1980 Union Act Yes1980 Union Act Yes Never illegal Yes Never illegal Yes Since 1756 Yes Since 1901
Izaakia (Pacifica) Izaakia Yes Never illegal Yes 1614 with introduction of Marriage Yes 1614 with introduction of Marriage Yes Never illegal Yes Never illegal NoNone NoNone
Kliegme (Pacifica) Kliegme Yes Legal since 2014 No No No No No No
UPRAN (Pacifica) Rhayna Yes Legal since 1965 Yes Legal since 1965 Yes Legal since 1965 Yes Legal since 1965 Yes Since 1965 No None Yes Since 2002
Sedunn (Pacifica) Sedunn Yes Never illegal No legal distinction between unions and marriage Yes Never governed by law Yes Never governed by law Yes Never illegal Yes Since 1978 No (Proposed)
Transsuneria (Pacifica) Transsuneria Yes Legal since 1971 Yes Registered partnerships since 2008 No (Proposed) No (Proposed) Yes Since 2016 Yes Since 2016 No

Notes
 Emerald-Denver: LGBT Rights were always implied to be legal under the 1756 Union Acts of Emerald and the 1901 Federal Act of Denver, however they weren't blatantly laid out until the 1980/85 Union Acts which added Marriages, while the previous 2 only laid out Same-Sex Unions. The 1901 Federal Act(Later added to 1980/85 Act) was the first to offer Trans Rights, while discrimination against LGBT People were declared illegal in the 1756 Union Act, although it wouldn't enforced until the mid-1900's.
 Sedunn: While Sedunn was generally tolerant of same-sex sexual activity and while there have been any specific laws governing who could be married, same-sex marriage and families were considered taboo well into the mid-1900s. Regarding laws concerning gender identity, the state does not keep specific records of it other than an entry in the medical journal at birth which cannot be edited.
 UPRAN: Although a portion of judges recognize the pretext of homophobia in many cases of aggression or injustice, there isn't an actual law for these cases, and there can be judges that do not recognize the pretext of homophobia.