LGBT-related laws by country or territory (Pacifica)

From TSP Encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Rights affecting lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) people vary greatly by country or jurisdiction—encompassing everything from the legal recognition of same-sex marriage to the death penalty for homosexuality.

LGBT rights in: Same-sex sexual activity Recognition of same-sex unions Same-sex marriage Adoption by same-sex couples LGBT people allowed to serve openly in military Anti-discrimination laws concerning sexual orientation Laws concerning gender identity/expression
Aberstopia (Pacifica) Aberstopia No (Proposed) No (Proposed) No No Yes Since 2020 No No
Template:Country data Akarina No Made illegal in 2024 No Yes Made legal in 2024 in Corvus. No All forms of adoption is outlawed. No No No Made illegal in 2024
 Alcoalitania Yes Legal since 2004 No Yes Legal since 2004 No (Proposed) No No None No None
Emerald-Denver (Pacifica) Emerald-Denver Yes Never illegal Yes1756 Union Act, 1901 Federal Act, 1980 Union Act Yes1980 Union Act Yes Never illegal Yes Never illegal Yes Since 1756 Yes Since 1901
 Holy Free Yes Never illegal Yes 2021 Life Partnership Act No (Proposed) No (Proposed) No No (Proposed) No
 Ikoania Yes Never illegal Yes 1990; Recognized along with the 1990 Constitutional Amendment Yes 1990 Constitutional Amendment Yes Provision under 1889 Children's Act Yes Never illegal Yes Since 1972 Yes Since 2003
Izaakia (Pacifica) Izaakia Yes Never illegal Yes 1614 with introduction of Marriage Yes 1614 with introduction of Marriage Yes Never illegal Yes Never illegal NoNone NoNone
Kliegme (Pacifica) Kliegme Yes Legal since 2014 No No No No No No
 Kustannuksan Empire Yes Never illegal Yes Never illegal Yes Never illegal Yes Never illegal Yes Never illegal No None No None
Nasphilitae (Pacifica) Nasphilitae Yes Act of Sexual Liberties 1901 No No (Proposed) No Yes Ordinance of Peerage Monopoly on Arms 1960.,
Appended Clause of Sexual Liberties and the Military 1967.
Yes Ordinance of Guaranteeing Dignity 1853.,
Act on Prohibition of Discrimination & Hate Speech 1963.
Yes Ordinance of Universal Suffrage 1852.,
Act of Sexual Liberties 1901.,
Appended Clause of Total Sexual Liberation 1971.,
Act of Gender Identities 1987.
Nicholas and Great Britain (Pacifica) Nicholas and Great Britain Yes Since 2009 Yes 2010 Civil Partnership Act Yes 2018 Same Sex Marriage Act No (Proposed) Yes Since 2013 Yes Since 2009 Yes Amendment 76, 2019

No

Pyhdon-Fálistríca Yes Amendment 76, 1919 Yes Amendment 76, 1919 Yes Amendment 76, 1919 Yes Amendment 76, 1919 Yes Amendment 76, 2009 Yes Amendment 76, 2019 Yes Amendment 76, 2019
UPRAN (Pacifica) Rhayna Yes Legal since 1965 Yes Legal since 1965 Yes Legal since 1965 Yes Legal since 1965 Yes Since 1965 No None Yes Since 2002
Ryccia (Pacifica) Ryccia Yes Legal as part of the Charter of Liberties Act of 1932 Yes 'De facto' recognized as a "non-romantic household unit" in the Charter of Liberties Act of 1932; 'De jure' recognized in 1968 Yes Legal since 1988 Military Decree and formalized by 1989 Same-Sex State Marriage Act; religious ceremonies legalized by 2001 amendment to 1989 Same-Sex State Marriage Act Yes 'De facto' never illegal; recognized by 1998 Sexual and Gender Identity Protections and Liberties Act Yes 'De facto' decriminalized since 1926; 'de jure' legalized as part of the Charter of Liberties Act of 1932 Yes State discrimination banned as part of the Charter of Liberties Act of 1932; other forms of discrimination banned by 1998 Sexual and Gender Identity Protections and Liberties Act Yes Legal as part of the Charter of Liberties Act of 1932
Sedunn (Pacifica) Sedunn Yes Never illegal No legal distinction between unions and marriage Yes Never governed by law Yes Never governed by law Yes Never illegal Yes Since 1978 No (Proposed)
Template:Country data Sokhanistan Sokhanistan Yes Never illegal No legal distinction between unions and marriage Yes Never governed by law Yes Never governed by law Yes Never illegal Yes Never governed by law Yes Since 1864
Techganet (Pacifica) Techganet Yes 2017 Amendment to Penal Code Yes November 2017 Civil Unions Act No (Proposed) Yes Provision under 2017 Civil Unions Act Yes March 2001 Anti-Discriminatory Conscription Act Yes June 2000 Anti-Discrimination Act No
Tepertopia (Pacifica) Tepertopia Yes Since 1968 No Introduced 1993, abolished and all extant unions converted to marriages in 2017 Yes Since 2017 Yes Since 2017 Yes Since 1995 Yes Since 1995 No
Transsuneria (Pacifica) Transsuneria Yes Legal since 1971 Yes Registered partnerships since 2008 No (Proposed) No (Proposed) Yes Since 2016 Yes Never illegal No
Valkyria (Pacifica) Valkyria Yes Legal since 1971 Yes Registered partnerships since 2000 Yes Legal since 2016 Yes Legal since 2016 Yes Since 2016 Yes Since 2000 Yes Since 2016
 Vrigny Yes Never illegal No distinction between unions and marriage Yes 1806; first regulated by the Republican Constitution, but had been present prior in the Zarnarchy Yes 1806; first regulated by the Republican Constitution, but had been present prior in the Zarnarchy Yes Never illegal Yes Active during 1908-1921; 1932-1953 and since 2014 Yes Since 2014

Notes
 Emerald-Denver: LGBT Rights were always implied to be legal under the 1756 Union Acts of Emerald and the 1901 Federal Act of Denver, however they weren't blatantly laid out until the 1980/85 Union Acts which added Marriages, while the previous 2 only laid out Same-Sex Unions. The 1901 Federal Act(Later added to 1980/85 Act) was the first to offer Trans Rights, while discrimination against LGBT People were declared illegal in the 1756 Union Act, although it wouldn't enforced until the mid-1900's.
 Sedunn: While Sedunn was generally tolerant of same-sex sexual activity and while there have been no specific laws governing who could be married, same-sex marriage and families were considered taboo well into the mid-1900s. Regarding laws concerning gender identity, the state does not keep specific records of it other than an entry in the medical journal at birth which cannot be edited.
 UPRAN: Although a portion of judges recognize the pretext of homophobia in many cases of aggression or injustice, there isn't an actual law for these cases, and there can be judges that do not recognize the pretext of homophobia.
 Nasphilitae: Home Rule Act of November 10. 1662. mandates that, unless explicitly regulated, all activities be considered illegal. Although no explicit Act prohibits same-sex unions, same-sex marriage nor adoption by same-sex couples, the Courts do not recognize them as legal partnerships due to lack of existing explicit regulation which would legalize them. Same-sex marriage Act has been proposed in 2007., though the completion of its legislative procedure has been stalled since.